Crawl and indexation
Crawl paths, status codes, robots directives, canonicals, sitemaps, parameters, and index coverage.
Technical SEO
Technical SEO built by people who understand code.
Find the technical constraints that suppress qualified discovery, then fix them with implementation detail your developers can use.
Best forSaaS, ecommerce, marketplace, publisher, and app teams with complex websites or unresolved indexation problems.
Why GadzooksGadzooks can diagnose templates, routing, rendering, deployment, and analytics in the same review as crawl and search performance.
Problem recognition
Signals that this work deserves attention.
The audit begins with observable symptoms and business impact, not a generic checklist.
- Important pages are discovered slowly or not indexed
- JavaScript rendering changes what crawlers can see
- Canonical, pagination, faceted, or parameter signals conflict
- A redesign or migration caused traffic and URL instability
- Core Web Vitals vary widely across templates
- Structured data is invalid, duplicated, or unsupported by visible content
Workstreams
What the service includes.
Scope is selected from these workstreams based on the evidence and the agreed outcome.
Rendering
Server output, hydration, lazy loading, internal links, and content parity across browsers and crawlers.
Architecture
Taxonomy, URL rules, click depth, orphan detection, breadcrumbs, and internal authority flow.
Performance
Template-level LCP, INP, CLS, asset loading, caching, fonts, images, and script budgets.
Migrations
URL inventories, redirect maps, launch validation, rollback signals, and post-migration monitoring.
Structured data
Truthful JSON-LD mapped to visible entities, pages, services, articles, and breadcrumbs.
Deliverables
Clear outputs, owners, and review points.
Audits are delivered as a defined project. Implementation and validation can continue as a focused sprint or recurring technical SEO program.
- Prioritized technical issue register with impact, evidence, owner, and acceptance criteria
- Crawl and indexation findings with affected URL samples
- Template and code-level implementation guidance
- Redirect, canonical, sitemap, or architecture specifications where needed
- Validation crawl and decision memo after changes ship
Starting investment
A clear planning threshold for this service.
The final proposal confirms the exact workload, ownership, assumptions, exclusions, and review points.
Starting investment
$1,250
per project
A focused audit and implementation specification for crawling, rendering, indexation, templates, migrations, structured data, or performance.
- Crawl and indexation review for up to 500 indexable URLs
- Search Console, robots, sitemap, canonicals, templates, and schema review
- Priority issue register with affected URL samples
- Developer-ready requirements and one validation crawl
Large migrations, multi-domain platforms, and ongoing implementation are scoped separately.
Delivery comparison
Compare the operating model, not only the headline price.
The useful question is who connects diagnosis, implementation, evidence, and validation across the complete service.
| What to compare | Gadzooks Solutions | Common freelance model | Common software or package model |
|---|---|---|---|
| Audit method | Rendered crawl, Search Console evidence, template review, and manual validation | Often limited to the hours or tools named in the contract | Usually an automated crawl export |
| Implementation | Developer-ready requirements, samples, owners, and acceptance checks | Varies by the individual specialist | Recommendations only |
| Prioritization | Business impact, confidence, effort, dependencies, and release risk | Often task or issue based | Tool severity score |
| Validation | Post-change crawl and documented pass or fail review | Usually an add-on | Run the tool again |
These columns describe common purchasing models, not every freelancer, agency, or platform. Compare the actual proposal, evidence, ownership, exclusions, and validation offered by any provider.
Process
From diagnosis to a documented decision.
- 1Discovery
- 2Prioritization
- 3Implementation
- 4Validation
- 5Reporting
Measurement
Track progress without confusing visibility with revenue.
Reporting distinguishes leading signals from business outcomes and records attribution limitations.
Valid indexable URLs, crawl waste, error counts, template pass rates, and Core Web Vitals coverage.
Qualified non-brand sessions, signups, demos, purchases, calls, and organic revenue by landing-page group.
Evidence standard
Proof means context, method, and limitations.
Every recommendation includes the affected surface, evidence, expected behavior, and a validation method. Rankings are never guaranteed.
Common questions
Direct answers before the scope starts.
Can you implement technical SEO fixes?
Yes. Implementation can be scoped for this PHP site and for client platforms when repository access, ownership, and acceptance criteria are clear.
Do we need a complete rebuild?
Usually not. The first goal is to isolate high-impact template, routing, crawl, and performance constraints before recommending larger engineering work.
How do you prioritize findings?
Findings are ranked by business relevance, affected demand, crawl or index impact, implementation effort, dependency, and confidence.
Do you guarantee recovery after a migration?
No. Gadzooks can reduce migration risk and validate signals, but search engines control crawling, indexing, and ranking.
Next step
Get a Search Visibility Audit
Start with a focused review of the highest-impact constraint.
Share the website, market, business goal, and current evidence. Gadzooks will recommend the smallest useful first scope.